|
Criteria |
Outstanding (20 points) |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
No Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Content |
Student’s posts demonstrate clear understanding of the readings and course materials, use excellent examples, and address all questions posed in the instructions. |
Student’s posts demonstrate good understanding of the readings and course materials, use good examples, and address all questions posed in the instructions. |
Student’s posts demonstrate fair understanding of the readings and course materials, use adequate examples, and address all questions posed in the instructions. |
Student’s posts demonstrate little understanding of the readings and course materials, use poor examples, and do not address all questions posed in the instructions. |
Student’s posts do not refer to the readings or course materials, do not use any examples, or do not address all questions posed in the instructions. |
|
Quality |
All of the student’s posts add value, encourage further scholarly discussion, support academic growth of the other students, and are respectful to other students and the instructor. |
Most of the student’s posts add value, encourage further scholarly discussion, support academic growth of the other students, and are respectful to other students and the instructor. |
Several of the student’s posts add value, encourage further scholarly discussion, support academic growth of the other students, and are respectful to other students and the instructor. |
Some of the student’s posts add value, encourage further scholarly discussion, support academic growth of the other students, and are respectful to other students and the instructor. |
Student’s posts do not add value, encourage further scholarly discussion, support academic growth of the other students, or are not respectful to other students or the instructor. |
|
Quantity |
Student posted a discussion post of suitable length and more than required minimum number of peer responses. |
Student posted a discussion post of suitable length and at least the required minimum number of peer responses. |
Student posted a discussion post of sufficient length and most of the required minimum number of peer responses. |
Student posted a discussion post of insufficient length or did not post the required minimum number of peer responses. |
Student did not post a discussion post or the required minimum number of peer responses. |
|
Grammar and Spelling |
All of the student’s posts are grammatically correct with no misspellings or incomplete sentences. |
Most of the student’s posts are grammatically correct with no misspellings or incomplete sentences. |
Several of the student’s posts are grammatically correct with no misspellings or incomplete sentences. |
Some of the student’s posts are grammatically correct with no misspellings or incomplete sentences. |
Student’s posts are grammatically incorrect with frequent misspellings, and incomplete sentences. |
|
Citing References and Providing Links |
All of the student’s references are cited correctly in proper citation style (APA, MLA, or Chicago) and all the links (if provided) are working. |
Most of the student’s references are cited correctly in proper citation style (APA, MLA, or Chicago) and/or most of the links (if provided) are working. |
Several of the student’s references are cited correctly in proper citation style (APA, MLA, or Chicago) and/or several of the links (if provided) are working. |
Some of the student’s references are cited correctly in proper citation style (APA, MLA, or Chicago) and/or some of the links (if provided) are working. |
Student does not cite references correctly in proper citation style (APA, MLA, or Chicago) or provide working links. |